No one sees whether reporting is complete
Two disconnected processes produce two partial views. No single team can say whether the insurer’s reporting is done.
From payments to hospitals, physicians, medical groups, and other providers to coverage for every insured member, Zenwork brings everything into a single process for preparation, validation, filing, furnishing, and corrections.
Speak to an Expert
Payment reporting comes from finance, procurement, and accounts payable. Coverage reporting comes from enrollment and membership. Different owners, different data, different deadlines.
Two disconnected processes produce two partial views. No single team can say whether the insurer’s reporting is done.
Claims, provider management, procurement, AP, and finance each hold a different version of the provider’s legal name, TIN, and payment entity. Tax teams rebuild the reporting record by hand.
Enrollments, terminations, plan changes, dependent additions, and address updates accumulate month by month. Along with that, missing and unverified identification numbers pile up too.
As filing season nears, issues such as missing tax documents, name-TIN mismatches, and coverage gaps surface. This amplifies manifold as the insurer scales its business.
Zenwork supports reporting for payments made to providers and health coverage provided to insured individuals. By managing both requirements through a single partner, insurers can avoid maintaining separate reporting workflows.
Collect tax documents, validate legal name and TIN, and bring payment data together across source systems and entities. Then run preparation, review, supported filing, delivery, and corrections.
Enrollment and coverage data moves into a standardized process. Preparation, review, supported federal and state filing, and individual furnishing all run the same way.
Affected records get separated from clean ones, so clean records keep moving. Rejections, supported corrections and delivery history stay with the record.
Intake, validation, supported filing, furnishing, and corrections are standardized across legal entities, lines of business and applicable state requirements.
Zenwork does not adjudicate medical claims or determine coverage eligibility. It makes the resulting payment and coverage records ready for applicable tax information reporting.
Some states impose their own coverage reporting requirements on insurers. Each comes with its own format, deadline, and submission route.
Applicable state coverage reporting runs through the same process as federal. The team doesn’t stand up a parallel project every year.
State coverage requirements don’t always follow the federal calendar. Holding both in one workflow keeps the earliest obligation visible.
Run reporting across legal entities and lines of business within a single structure, as status and permissions are set at the entity level.
There are separate permissions for preparation, review, approval, and eFiling. User-level activity logs are maintained, so you know who did what.
Validation results, IRS acknowledgments, rejections, corrections, and furnishing are captured against the record. Answering audit questions becomes just a matter of retrieval of data.
No. Zenwork takes the payment and coverage records your systems already produce and makes them ready for applicable tax information reporting. Claims adjudication and eligibility stay with your platforms.
Yes. Both run through one process for preparation, validation, supported filing, furnishing and corrections. That is the point of the platform for insurers, rather than splitting the two across separate processes and vendors.
Payment data is brought together across source systems and insurance entities into one reporting record. Tax-document collection, IRS name–TIN matching and business verification validate the provider’s legal identity before filing.
Zenwork conducts a data-completeness review ahead of the filing season. This ensures you can identify and rectify coverage data gaps on time.
Yes. Zenwork standardizes intake, validation, supported filing, furnishing, and corrections. It does so across legal entities, lines of business, and applicable state requirements.
Let’s map both sides of your reporting against the systems that produce them. We’ll show you where one process removes duplicated work.
Speak to an Expert